| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
Canada
7969 Posts |
 Posted - 08 Jan 2013 : 18:54:19
|
| This computer is using Chrome(23.0) in WINE, my other using IE(8.0) in Win7. I've flushed caches, cookies, checked settings, etc. |
[/Ayrik] |
 |
|
|
Kentinal
Great Reader
4685 Posts |
Posted - 08 Jan 2013 : 19:12:42
|
| Well I replied twice, I am using Firefox |
"Small beings can have small wisdom," the dragon said. "And small wise beings are better than small fools. Listen: Wisdom is caring for afterwards."
"Caring for afterwards ...? Ker repeated this without understanding.
"After action, afterwards," the dragon said. "Choose the afterwards first, then the action. Fools choose action first."
"Judgement" copyright 2003 by Elizabeth Moon |
|
|
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
USA
36779 Posts |
|
|
Kentinal
Great Reader
4685 Posts |
Posted - 08 Jan 2013 : 19:40:49
|
| Wooly, for clarity, Ayrik sent me a PM, I replied without quote and with quote within 30 seconds. Based on received PM, in theory second PM was saved, because I read it once before. However it also would appear it was saved when I read the PM the first time. |
"Small beings can have small wisdom," the dragon said. "And small wise beings are better than small fools. Listen: Wisdom is caring for afterwards."
"Caring for afterwards ...? Ker repeated this without understanding.
"After action, afterwards," the dragon said. "Choose the afterwards first, then the action. Fools choose action first."
"Judgement" copyright 2003 by Elizabeth Moon |
|
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31701 Posts |
Posted - 09 Jan 2013 : 01:08:22
|
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
I've never had any issue using the Reply function in PMs...
I'll say that I've encountered errors. But that was only during the time of the first Great ASP Error Saga. I've not had any issues with the PM reply function since. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
|
Dennis
Great Reader
9933 Posts |
Posted - 09 Jan 2013 : 08:18:13
|
Posting replies (in threads, not PMs), deleting, and editing posts sometimes take a minute or more. |
Every beginning has an end. |
|
|
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
Canada
7969 Posts |
Posted - 09 Jan 2013 : 09:23:38
|
| Haha, Sage/Wooly, you have my permission to logon as me and check the Private Message Inbox. I assure you there is no REPLY button anywhere to be found, unless I'm blind. Alternately, I can email you screenshots? |
[/Ayrik] |
|
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31701 Posts |
|
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
Canada
7969 Posts |
Posted - 15 Jan 2013 : 10:38:17
|
| Ah ... I think the reason I couldn't reply to messages is that my Inbox is full (actually stuffed beyond full). I'm sure if I delete a couple dozen PMs I'll be able to reply again. Embarassing. |
[/Ayrik] |
|
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31701 Posts |
Posted - 15 Jan 2013 : 14:09:59
|
Well, I sent my reply back to you via email explaining that very reason for your inability to use the reply function on PMs. Did you not receive it? [Here's hoping I sent the message to the right person.  ] |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
|
Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire
USA
15724 Posts |
Posted - 15 Jan 2013 : 14:52:24
|
There is an easy work-around for that. I have NEVER emptied my in-box - its always full.
(I know there's a Paris Hilton or Snooky joke in there somewhere).  |
"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone
|
|
|
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
Canada
7969 Posts |
Posted - 15 Jan 2013 : 14:53:54
|
No emails received from Sage or Candlekeep, and just updated the email address in my profile (please don't get hacked!), but the can't-reply problem is solved.
[Edit]
ON a related note, requesting a larger PM mailbox ... 20+20 just never seems to be enough. I realize well the server-side resources needed for such, and I don't know the specific limits on Alaundo's infernal contracts with the extraplanar webhosts, but it seems (at a glance) that there really aren't terribly many active Candlekeep members to produce a heavy load. Perhaps grant increased PM capacity only to scribes who attained higher ranks? (lol, not at the 10K posts milestone though, not yet ...) |
[/Ayrik] |
Edited by - Ayrik on 15 Jan 2013 15:00:43 |
|
|
|
Kentinal
Great Reader
4685 Posts |
Posted - 15 Jan 2013 : 15:19:44
|
| You have 20 in? I always thought 10 was too little. |
"Small beings can have small wisdom," the dragon said. "And small wise beings are better than small fools. Listen: Wisdom is caring for afterwards."
"Caring for afterwards ...? Ker repeated this without understanding.
"After action, afterwards," the dragon said. "Choose the afterwards first, then the action. Fools choose action first."
"Judgement" copyright 2003 by Elizabeth Moon |
|
|
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
Canada
7969 Posts |
Posted - 15 Jan 2013 : 15:48:13
|
Earlier I had something like 38/20 Inbox and tons in the Outbox. Candlekeep starts getting cranky when you exceed 20.
I understand that some scribes (who do not all post in scrolls, at least not outside of the Candlekeep Inn areas) make heavy use of PMs in play-by-post styles. And my "normal" use might be excessive or puny compared to other individuals ... just sayin' though, the PM limits seem a bit low for regularly active (and dare I say, handsome) scribes like myself. |
[/Ayrik] |
|
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31701 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 01:55:41
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ayrik
No emails received from Sage or Candlekeep, and just updated the email address in my profile (please don't get hacked!), but the can't-reply problem is solved.
[Edit]
ON a related note, requesting a larger PM mailbox ... 20+20 just never seems to be enough. I realize well the server-side resources needed for such, and I don't know the specific limits on Alaundo's infernal contracts with the extraplanar webhosts, but it seems (at a glance) that there really aren't terribly many active Candlekeep members to produce a heavy load. Perhaps grant increased PM capacity only to scribes who attained higher ranks? (lol, not at the 10K posts milestone though, not yet ...)
I was always under the assumption that we all had the same PM Inbox capacity.
Alaundo's never said otherwise, so it might be worth checking further into this. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31701 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 01:57:36
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ayrik
Earlier I had something like 38/20 Inbox and tons in the Outbox. Candlekeep starts getting cranky when you exceed 20.
I understand that some scribes (who do not all post in scrolls, at least not outside of the Candlekeep Inn areas) make heavy use of PMs in play-by-post styles. And my "normal" use might be excessive or puny compared to other individuals ... just sayin' though, the PM limits seem a bit low for regularly active (and dare I say, handsome) scribes like myself.
This is weird, because I'm looking over my own account, and I've got messages [some of which are still unanswered { }] stretching back to 2004. It seems I have no storage limit. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
Canada
7969 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 02:19:34
|
| Ha, is that when you login with a "normal" user account? |
[/Ayrik] |
|
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31701 Posts |
|
|
Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire
USA
15724 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 03:56:53
|
I have no storage limit either. I've never deleted a single PM (and I have A LOT).
Some of the oldest were from a scribe who is no longer with us... the last thing he sent me was a map request. 
You want to PM someone, instead of responding to their PM, just click on their name and PM them that way - works for me. The only thing you have to do is re-type the subject bar.
LOL - I just checked - I have 287.  |
"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone
|
Edited by - Markustay on 16 Jan 2013 03:57:54 |
|
|
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
USA
36779 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 04:44:45
|
I've got a buttload of PMs, too, both in my Inbox and in my Outbox.
Unfortunately, I did delete some, back in 2006 -- I was recently trying to find one I'd sent in April '06, but my Outbox only goes back to October! |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen! |
|
|
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
Canada
7969 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 04:51:43
|
After receiving a new PM (sending one to myself), I see:quote:
You have reached your Private Message Limit(26/20)
To send additional Private Messages you must clean your Inbox.
I can still send PMs (via member profiles) but cannot reply to PMs (no button to click, anywhere). |
[/Ayrik] |
Edited by - Ayrik on 16 Jan 2013 04:53:50 |
|
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31701 Posts |
|
|
Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire
USA
15724 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 14:42:55
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ayrik
After receiving a new PM (sending one to myself), I see:quote:
You have reached your Private Message Limit(26/20)
To send additional Private Messages you must clean your Inbox.
I can still send PMs (via member profiles) but cannot reply to PMs (no button to click, anywhere).
Which is precisely how I do it - its no big deal. Just ignore the 'you have reached your limit' message and click on the person's name (which is right there in the PM you received). Nothing has ever stopped me from sending someone a PM directly.
I have to retype the subject bar, but thats not a problem. I'd rather do that then loose important info (some of those PMs contain some juicy bits!) Of course, I could just put it all in a file on my computer... but if I had done that in the past, guess what? I wouldn't have all of it still. I would have lost them with everything else (which makes me doubly afraid to delete them all now). |
"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone
|
|
|
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
Canada
7969 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 16:07:42
|
Agreed, it's no big deal since there's a workaround. My initial "complaint" was really about the inconveniently lacking "reply" button which automatically quotes stuff. I like to quote stuff in PMs, since I imagine some people are like me and sometimes have so many random things going on that they need a context reminder/link when switching gears. Not mentioning any names here *cough*Sage*cough*
If Alaundo truly wishes to enforce PM storage limits then he'll either patch the workaround approach or force scribes to clean up before leaving the page or simply put an expiry timer on oldest messages. |
[/Ayrik] |
Edited by - Ayrik on 16 Jan 2013 16:10:34 |
|
|
|
Kentinal
Great Reader
4685 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 16:41:01
|
No: no timer, I have things saved from years ago. I still would like more then 10 though.
|
"Small beings can have small wisdom," the dragon said. "And small wise beings are better than small fools. Listen: Wisdom is caring for afterwards."
"Caring for afterwards ...? Ker repeated this without understanding.
"After action, afterwards," the dragon said. "Choose the afterwards first, then the action. Fools choose action first."
"Judgement" copyright 2003 by Elizabeth Moon |
|
|
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
Canada
7969 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 16:44:31
|
| You only get 10? I have 26/20 (until recently something like 40/20) in Inbox, and seemingly uncapped Outbox. |
[/Ayrik] |
|
|
|
Kentinal
Great Reader
4685 Posts |
Posted - 16 Jan 2013 : 17:08:58
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ayrik
You only get 10? I have 26/20 (until recently something like 40/20) in Inbox, and seemingly uncapped Outbox.
Well all I recall was candlekeep sent me an email years ago that I was full at 10 and could not receive any more unless I deleted or saved. It clearly is possible I have more room now. *shrugs* |
"Small beings can have small wisdom," the dragon said. "And small wise beings are better than small fools. Listen: Wisdom is caring for afterwards."
"Caring for afterwards ...? Ker repeated this without understanding.
"After action, afterwards," the dragon said. "Choose the afterwards first, then the action. Fools choose action first."
"Judgement" copyright 2003 by Elizabeth Moon |
|
|
|
Caladan Brood
Senior Scribe
Norway
410 Posts |
Posted - 10 Jun 2013 : 17:32:47
|
| I was wondering why there is no Play-by-Post section here (unless I've totally missed it); I'd gladly run a party of three-five adventurers through the AD&D realms; all that's really needed is a dice roll function. Yes there are many options available online (pbem, Roll20, Fantasy Battlegrounds, forums) but having a section here for Realms-games only could be useful even if you're not playing (perusing threads for ideas, see other people's characters, etc). Feel free to poke me with a rusty halberd if I've overlooked PBP's existence at Candlekeep. |
|
|
|
Caladan Brood
Senior Scribe
Norway
410 Posts |
Posted - 27 Jun 2013 : 17:06:43
|
| Seventeen days later and still wondering :) Anyone? |
|
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31701 Posts |
Posted - 29 Jun 2013 : 03:40:49
|
quote:
Originally posted by Caladan Brood
I was wondering why there is no Play-by-Post section here (unless I've totally missed it); I'd gladly run a party of three-five adventurers through the AD&D realms; all that's really needed is a dice roll function. Yes there are many options available online (pbem, Roll20, Fantasy Battlegrounds, forums) but having a section here for Realms-games only could be useful even if you're not playing (perusing threads for ideas, see other people's characters, etc). Feel free to poke me with a rusty halberd if I've overlooked PBP's existence at Candlekeep.
This is, essentially, what the scrolls stacked on the shelf of the Candlekeep Inn are for on this site.
If you peruse any of the pre-existing scrolls on that shelf, you'll note a couple have been used for various Play-By-Post games here at Candlekeep. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
What do you want to see on the Candlekeep site?
