T O P I C R E V I E W |
Faediira |
Posted - 24 Feb 2017 : 17:44:06 I was wondering something about Dragon + are they accepting submissions of any kind and if so where are the guidelines for them? |
9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
The Sage |
Posted - 25 Feb 2017 : 06:09:56 I'll keep pestering her... just for you, Wooly.
It'll be on my "To-Do" list as well. |
Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 25 Feb 2017 : 04:24:29 quote: Originally posted by The Sage
Thanks. It's feeling good to be back.
Now, if we can get the Lady K to put in one of her rare appearances...
And they are rare indeed; the Sage checks things off of his legendary to-do list more frequently than Lady K appearing here! |
The Sage |
Posted - 25 Feb 2017 : 03:17:37 Thanks. It's feeling good to be back. |
Fellfire |
Posted - 24 Feb 2017 : 22:20:46 I didn't even know this was still a thing. Gave up on it long ago.
Good to see ya, Sage. |
The Sage |
Posted - 24 Feb 2017 : 21:49:12 Wooly has the right of it. Last word, as far as I can recall, was that all presented content was drawn from inside sources. |
KanzenAU |
Posted - 24 Feb 2017 : 21:46:28 Agreed. I believe Bart Carroll is taking it over, so hopefully in the issue on Monday we'll see a bit of a revamp on that revamp. |
Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 24 Feb 2017 : 20:52:44 quote: Originally posted by KanzenAU
I haven't gotten the impression they accept submissions. Every now and again they highlight something on DM's Guild, but that's pretty much it. There hasn't been much good stuff in the revamped mag - lots of room for improvement.
There hasn't been much stuff in the revamped mag, period. |
KanzenAU |
Posted - 24 Feb 2017 : 20:42:19 I haven't gotten the impression they accept submissions. Every now and again they highlight something on DM's Guild, but that's pretty much it. There hasn't been much good stuff in the revamped mag - lots of room for improvement. |
Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 24 Feb 2017 : 18:02:33 I'd be surprised if they're accepting transmissions. WotC seems to prefer doing it all in-house, now. It's one of the many reasons I consider the digital thing to be a very poor substitute for the print magazines we once had. |